Art of Dr. Seuss Fraud COVERUP
Original published February 3, 2007 (Updated May 31, 2007)
-LIFETIME SEUSS ARTWORK- Obviously, during his lifetime, the artist Theodor (Dr. Seuss) Geisel created his "Oh, the Places You'll Go!" artwork. On the left is a reproduction of his artwork being sold on the www.allposters.com website for $19.99 each. -NOTICE- the size of the striped balloon, how close the striped balloon is to the castle-like structure, the small pale yellow balloon above the striped balloon and the artwork's soft pastel-like colors.
-POSTHUMOUS SEUSS FAKE- Now, compare the above reproduction of Theodor (Dr. Seuss) Geisel's artwork with the non-disclosed chromist-made -FAKE- on the left. This -FAKE- was drawn, after 1997 some six years or more after Theodor (Dr. Seuss) Geisel's death in 1991, by a chromist (someone who copies art). This non-disclosed -FAKE- is being promoted, by Audrey Geisel, The Chase Group and participating galleries, as Theodor (Dr. Seuss) Geisel's "Oh, the Places You'll Go!" and being offered for sale at $425 each in a so-called "Limited Edition of 2500 Arabic" for a gross of over $1,062,500 dollars. How can you tell it's -FAKE-? Aside, dead artists don't create art, -NOTICE-, in this -FAKE-, the size of the striped balloon is smaller and farther away from the castle-like structure, a small balloon above it is missing and the color is darker.
In other words, Audrey Geisel, The Chase Group and all participating galleries are offering the public for sale at $225 or more each the so-called "Art of Dr. Seuss" but in reality giving non-disclosed chromist-made -FAKES-. otherwise known as the -BAIT & SWITCH-.
Since 1997, this has been the on-going "Art of Dr. Seuss” -FRAUD-.
The 72,000 or more so-called “lithographs,” “serigraphs” and edition “sculptures,” attributed to Theodor Geisel by Audrey Geisel, The Chase Group and participating art galleries, are not only non-disclosed -FAKES-, posthumously reproduced after 1997 but they have posthumously applied counterfeit “Dr. Seuss” signatures and edition numbers to foster the illusion that Theodor Geisel a.k.a. Dr. Seuss either created them and/or at least approve them when in fact he hasn't even seen them.
Once again to belabor the point, why hasn't Theodor Geisel seen them?
Because Theodor Geisel died in 1991, some six years before this -fraud- began. By definition, rule of law and laws of nature, the dead don’t create art after their death, much less sign or number anything.
In response to these -facts-, The Chase Group, located in the State of Illinois, has posted online a new www.drseussart.com/ faq.html website that is an attempt to -coverup- these allegations documented in this scholar’s prior published and posted "Art of Dr. Seuss FRAUD" monograph.
Here is one example:
-POSTHUMOUS SEUSS FAKE- In 2000, on The Chase Group's former www.chaseart.com website, they described the so-called "Yertle The Turtle," for sale at $225 each, as a "Hand-Pulled Plate Lithograph" and "© 2000 The Chase Group."
-POSTHUMOUS SEUSS FAKE- Now in 2006, on The Chase Group's new www.drseussart.com website for this same so-called "Yertle The Turtle," they have -REMOVED- "Hand-Pulled Plate Lithograph" and "© 2000 The Chase Group" and -REPLACED- it with "Dr. Seuss Artworks" and "© 1960."
Why would The Chase Group change the copyright date from "2000" to "1960" for this so-called Theodor (Dr. Seuss) Geisel's "Yertle The Turtle." much less eliminate the description of it as a: "Hand-Pulled Plate Lithograph" and replace it with the phrase "Dr. Seuss Artworks."
Could it be that a "1960" date is more plausible for so-called "artworks," much less "lithographs," than a "2000" date since Theodor Geisel died in 1991?
Hence, the -coverup-.
The Chase Group’s current www.drseussart.com website is not about full and honest disclosure, it is about fostering confusion to help obscure their cash-cow -fraud-.
The Chase Group’s website fosters misconceptions, misrepresentations and outright lies which results not only in consumer fraud but the poisoning of the marketplace against legitimate artists who create artwork, much less those merchants who sell fully disclosed -reproductions-.
Let's document their www.drseussart.com/faq.html website’s written statements to the facts.
FIRST, on this website, under "Frequently asked Questions," it asks the question: "How do I purchase Dr. Seuss artworks?"
Unfortunately, The Chase Group is -NOT- selling any "Dr. Seuss artworks." The Chase Group confirms that devastating fact later on their www.drseussart.com/faq.html website when they ask the question: “Were any Dr. Seuss serigraphs, lithographs or sculpture published during his lifetime?” and the answer given is: “No.”
So, anything posthumously reproduced would be, at best, a reproduction. At $225 to $9,000 more each, the Illinois based The Chase Group is selling non-disclosed reproductions as “Art of Dr. Seuss” in violation of the State of Illinois’ Chapter 815 statute requiring the disclosure of “reproductions,” if sold for $60 or more, as "reproductions."
SECOND, the question is asked: "How did The Art of Dr. Seuss project come to fruition?" The answer given is: "the work deserved further recognition."
How can any new “Art of Dr. Suess come to fruition” when The Chase Group admits none of these so-called “serigraphs, lithographs or sculpture” were made “during his lifetime.”
The Chase Group talks out of both sides of their mouths. They are hoping to confuse the public so they will accept, much less believe, that the living presence of the artist is not necessary to create art, much less to sign it.
THIRD, under this same question, "How did The Art of Dr. Seuss project come to fruition?,” next paragraph, it states: "lithographs, serigraphs and sculpture reproduced from Geisel's original drawings and paintings."
Fortunately, “drawings and paintings” reproduced, would, at best, be -reproductions-.
“Lithographs, serigraphs and sculpture" are original “works of visual art” themselves that can only be created by a living artist. "Lithographs, serigraphs and sculpture" would never be trivialized as reproductions of anything, much less “drawings and paintings."
This is confirmed by U.S. Customs regulations that state a "lithograph" or any other original printmaking medium must be "wholly executed by hand by the artist" and "excludes all photomechanical and mechanical processes."
Therefore, The Chase Group and participating galleries are actually -baiting & switching- the public by offering one thing “Art of Dr. Seuss” and "lithographs, serigraphs and sculpture" when they are actually selling, at best, -reproductions- of Dr. Seuss.
At $225 to $9,000 or more, would the public pay that much if they knew, at best, it was nothing more than a poster?
Additionally, under the same question: "How did The Art of Dr. Seuss project come to fruition?," third paragraph, it states: “This historic project has opened the world's eyes to the unique artistic talent of Dr. Seuss."
Theodor Geisel was dead when these non-disclosed "reproductions" were reproduced, it could -never- be his "artistic talent."
The dead don't have "artistic talent."
FOURTH, the question is asked: "Were any Dr. Seuss serigraphs, lithographs or sculpture published during his lifetime?"
As noted earlier, the answer given by The Chase Group, was “No.” The big problem, with this question, is "serigraphs, lithographs and sculpture" are -not- “published,” they are created by living artists.
Once again, this is confirmed by U.S. Customs regulations that state a "lithograph" or any other original printmaking medium must be "wholly executed by hand by the artist" and "excludes all photomechanical and mechanical processes."
Additionally, under U.S. Copyright Law, “limited editions" can only be "signed and numbered" by a living artist. Yet , since 1997, Theodor Geisel is credited, by The Chase Group, with creating 72,000 so-called "limited edition - lithographs, serigraphs and sculpture," with the illusion of his approval with a so-called "Dr. Seuss signature" applied.
Fortunately, under U.S. Copyright Law, U.S. Customs Law and Illinois Chapter 815, Theodor Geisel could not have created anything attributed to him after 1997 by The Chase Group. Why? Because Theodor Geisel (d 1991) was -dead-.
FIFTH, under "1. "The Illustration Art Collection," it states: "The majority of these works have been reproduced using an historic technique called hand-pulled lithography. This intentionally “low-tech” method involves highly skilled artisans and master printers whose job it is to faithfully recreate Seuss’s original works - The result is a beautifully created artwork."
In otherwords, The Chase Group is hiring chromists (someone who copies the artist’s work) to so-call “recreate Seuss’s original works” and then deceptively pass off these chromist-made and/or photomechanical reproductions as Theodor Geisel’s “artwork.”
That is a “knowing misrepresentation of a material fact or truth to induces a person to his or her own detriment” which is one legal definition of -fraud-.
If The Chase Group thought they could convince the public they were "alchemists" and could make gold from lead and sell it at $500 an ounce, they would no doubt try it.
SIXTH, under "2. The Secret Art and Archive Collection," it states: "Many of these works have been reproduced using hand-pulled serigraphy - this intentionally “low-tech” method is usually carried out under the direction of a master printmaker who must carefully breakdown an original painting into its many colors - print each color, one layer at a time."
“Serigraphs” can only be created by a -LIVING- artist.
“Serigraphs” are original works of visual art that must be, under U.S. Custom’s regulations, "wholly executed by hand by the artist." Specifically, the -living- artist would cut and/or paint stencils and print one color at a time and continue that creative process until the completion of that original “work of visual art” ie. serigraph.
If someone, other than the artist, legally -reproduces- “drawings {or} paintings,” in a silkscreen medium, it would be, at best, a -reproductions-
SEVENTH, under "2. The Secret Art and Archive Collection," second paragraph, it states: "some works in the collection employ more modern printmaking techniques not available to artists of past generations."
Funny, when these non-disclosed reproduction techniques were “employ{ed},” it wasn't available to Theodor Geisel either because he was -dead-.
Additionally, they state: "giclee offer a wide range of color saturation - Prints reproduced using this method capitalize on the brilliant fidelity of specially calibrated digital presses, coupled with inks and papers which were developed over many years and specifically designed for fine art printmaking."
The so-called "fine art printmaking" called "Giclee," when using the brightly colored dyes, is as lightfast as a "cereal box,” These contentious issues of lightfastness of giclee reproduction technology were documented and published in the October 1996 ART CALENDAR issue.
There goes their so-called "brilliant fidelity."
EIGHTH, and furthermore, it states: "Just as silkscreen printmaking revolutionized the way artist and printmakers expressed themselves in the 1960s, so too has giclee printmaking in the early 21st century."
What's incredibly obscene is Theodor Geisel died in the 20th-century and yet according to The Chase Group he is stilling coming out with new work in the 21st-century.
How's he doing that?
NINTH, under "3. The Collection of Unorthodox Taxidermy (Seuss Sculptures)," it states: "Today, Seuss’s sculptures are reproduced as hand-painted cast resin sculptures and are painstakingly prepared to accurately recreate the aesthetic brilliance of the originals."
The big problem is: "sculptures" are -not- reproduced. Under U.S. Copyright Law, sculptures are created by living artists. It is a massive oxymoron to misrepresent three-dimensional reproductions as "sculptures."
And for The Chase Group and participating galleries to do so for money, is “a knowing misrepresentation of the truth or concealment of a material fact to induce another to act to his or her detriment” which is one legal definition of -fraud-.
TENTH, the question is asked: "Are these works signed by Dr. Seuss."
The answer given is: "because the reproductions included in The Art of Dr. Seuss project were created after his lifetime, each limited edition lithograph and serigraph bears an Authorized Printed Signature and each sculpture an Authorized Engraved Signature."
"Signature," by definition, means autographed by the person on hand. Since, Theodor Geisel was -dead- when these 72,000 reproductions were posthumously reproduced with his so-called “signature” applied.
How’d the dead do that?
Once again, under U.S. Copyright Law, you can't have a "limited edition" attributed to a dead guy because they could not have obviously "signed and numbered" anything.
In other words, The Chase Group is, with impunity, forging Theodor Geisel’s work and his signature and calling them the "Art of Dr. Seuss" with "Dr. Seuss signatures" to help them defraud the public of hundreds to thousands of dollars each.
Finally, it asks: "Is there a certificate of authenticity issues for these works?" The answer given is: "Yes."
The Chase Group would have the public imagine 72,000 non-disclosed -fales-, with counterfeit signatures applied, are transformed magically to "{art}works" and authenticated by a piece of paper.
Sadly, in closing, for the consumers and legitimate artists, The Chase Group are one of the too many to mention alchemists of the 21st-century who come into the art industry with one goal: "why let the truth interfere with commerce."
For additional documentation, link to: Art of Dr. Seuss FRAUD
-LIFETIME SEUSS ARTWORK- Obviously, during his lifetime, the artist Theodor (Dr. Seuss) Geisel created his "Oh, the Places You'll Go!" artwork. On the left is a reproduction of his artwork being sold on the www.allposters.com website for $19.99 each. -NOTICE- the size of the striped balloon, how close the striped balloon is to the castle-like structure, the small pale yellow balloon above the striped balloon and the artwork's soft pastel-like colors.
-POSTHUMOUS SEUSS FAKE- Now, compare the above reproduction of Theodor (Dr. Seuss) Geisel's artwork with the non-disclosed chromist-made -FAKE- on the left. This -FAKE- was drawn, after 1997 some six years or more after Theodor (Dr. Seuss) Geisel's death in 1991, by a chromist (someone who copies art). This non-disclosed -FAKE- is being promoted, by Audrey Geisel, The Chase Group and participating galleries, as Theodor (Dr. Seuss) Geisel's "Oh, the Places You'll Go!" and being offered for sale at $425 each in a so-called "Limited Edition of 2500 Arabic" for a gross of over $1,062,500 dollars. How can you tell it's -FAKE-? Aside, dead artists don't create art, -NOTICE-, in this -FAKE-, the size of the striped balloon is smaller and farther away from the castle-like structure, a small balloon above it is missing and the color is darker.In other words, Audrey Geisel, The Chase Group and all participating galleries are offering the public for sale at $225 or more each the so-called "Art of Dr. Seuss" but in reality giving non-disclosed chromist-made -FAKES-. otherwise known as the -BAIT & SWITCH-.
Since 1997, this has been the on-going "Art of Dr. Seuss” -FRAUD-.
The 72,000 or more so-called “lithographs,” “serigraphs” and edition “sculptures,” attributed to Theodor Geisel by Audrey Geisel, The Chase Group and participating art galleries, are not only non-disclosed -FAKES-, posthumously reproduced after 1997 but they have posthumously applied counterfeit “Dr. Seuss” signatures and edition numbers to foster the illusion that Theodor Geisel a.k.a. Dr. Seuss either created them and/or at least approve them when in fact he hasn't even seen them.
Once again to belabor the point, why hasn't Theodor Geisel seen them?
Because Theodor Geisel died in 1991, some six years before this -fraud- began. By definition, rule of law and laws of nature, the dead don’t create art after their death, much less sign or number anything.
In response to these -facts-, The Chase Group, located in the State of Illinois, has posted online a new www.drseussart.com/ faq.html website that is an attempt to -coverup- these allegations documented in this scholar’s prior published and posted "Art of Dr. Seuss FRAUD" monograph.
Here is one example:
-POSTHUMOUS SEUSS FAKE- In 2000, on The Chase Group's former www.chaseart.com website, they described the so-called "Yertle The Turtle," for sale at $225 each, as a "Hand-Pulled Plate Lithograph" and "© 2000 The Chase Group."
-POSTHUMOUS SEUSS FAKE- Now in 2006, on The Chase Group's new www.drseussart.com website for this same so-called "Yertle The Turtle," they have -REMOVED- "Hand-Pulled Plate Lithograph" and "© 2000 The Chase Group" and -REPLACED- it with "Dr. Seuss Artworks" and "© 1960."Why would The Chase Group change the copyright date from "2000" to "1960" for this so-called Theodor (Dr. Seuss) Geisel's "Yertle The Turtle." much less eliminate the description of it as a: "Hand-Pulled Plate Lithograph" and replace it with the phrase "Dr. Seuss Artworks."
Could it be that a "1960" date is more plausible for so-called "artworks," much less "lithographs," than a "2000" date since Theodor Geisel died in 1991?
Hence, the -coverup-.
The Chase Group’s current www.drseussart.com website is not about full and honest disclosure, it is about fostering confusion to help obscure their cash-cow -fraud-.
The Chase Group’s website fosters misconceptions, misrepresentations and outright lies which results not only in consumer fraud but the poisoning of the marketplace against legitimate artists who create artwork, much less those merchants who sell fully disclosed -reproductions-.
Let's document their www.drseussart.com/faq.html website’s written statements to the facts.
FIRST, on this website, under "Frequently asked Questions," it asks the question: "How do I purchase Dr. Seuss artworks?"
Unfortunately, The Chase Group is -NOT- selling any "Dr. Seuss artworks." The Chase Group confirms that devastating fact later on their www.drseussart.com/faq.html website when they ask the question: “Were any Dr. Seuss serigraphs, lithographs or sculpture published during his lifetime?” and the answer given is: “No.”
So, anything posthumously reproduced would be, at best, a reproduction. At $225 to $9,000 more each, the Illinois based The Chase Group is selling non-disclosed reproductions as “Art of Dr. Seuss” in violation of the State of Illinois’ Chapter 815 statute requiring the disclosure of “reproductions,” if sold for $60 or more, as "reproductions."
SECOND, the question is asked: "How did The Art of Dr. Seuss project come to fruition?" The answer given is: "the work deserved further recognition."
How can any new “Art of Dr. Suess come to fruition” when The Chase Group admits none of these so-called “serigraphs, lithographs or sculpture” were made “during his lifetime.”
The Chase Group talks out of both sides of their mouths. They are hoping to confuse the public so they will accept, much less believe, that the living presence of the artist is not necessary to create art, much less to sign it.
THIRD, under this same question, "How did The Art of Dr. Seuss project come to fruition?,” next paragraph, it states: "lithographs, serigraphs and sculpture reproduced from Geisel's original drawings and paintings."
Fortunately, “drawings and paintings” reproduced, would, at best, be -reproductions-.
“Lithographs, serigraphs and sculpture" are original “works of visual art” themselves that can only be created by a living artist. "Lithographs, serigraphs and sculpture" would never be trivialized as reproductions of anything, much less “drawings and paintings."
This is confirmed by U.S. Customs regulations that state a "lithograph" or any other original printmaking medium must be "wholly executed by hand by the artist" and "excludes all photomechanical and mechanical processes."
Therefore, The Chase Group and participating galleries are actually -baiting & switching- the public by offering one thing “Art of Dr. Seuss” and "lithographs, serigraphs and sculpture" when they are actually selling, at best, -reproductions- of Dr. Seuss.
At $225 to $9,000 or more, would the public pay that much if they knew, at best, it was nothing more than a poster?
Additionally, under the same question: "How did The Art of Dr. Seuss project come to fruition?," third paragraph, it states: “This historic project has opened the world's eyes to the unique artistic talent of Dr. Seuss."
Theodor Geisel was dead when these non-disclosed "reproductions" were reproduced, it could -never- be his "artistic talent."
The dead don't have "artistic talent."
FOURTH, the question is asked: "Were any Dr. Seuss serigraphs, lithographs or sculpture published during his lifetime?"
As noted earlier, the answer given by The Chase Group, was “No.” The big problem, with this question, is "serigraphs, lithographs and sculpture" are -not- “published,” they are created by living artists.
Once again, this is confirmed by U.S. Customs regulations that state a "lithograph" or any other original printmaking medium must be "wholly executed by hand by the artist" and "excludes all photomechanical and mechanical processes."
Additionally, under U.S. Copyright Law, “limited editions" can only be "signed and numbered" by a living artist. Yet , since 1997, Theodor Geisel is credited, by The Chase Group, with creating 72,000 so-called "limited edition - lithographs, serigraphs and sculpture," with the illusion of his approval with a so-called "Dr. Seuss signature" applied.
Fortunately, under U.S. Copyright Law, U.S. Customs Law and Illinois Chapter 815, Theodor Geisel could not have created anything attributed to him after 1997 by The Chase Group. Why? Because Theodor Geisel (d 1991) was -dead-.
FIFTH, under "1. "The Illustration Art Collection," it states: "The majority of these works have been reproduced using an historic technique called hand-pulled lithography. This intentionally “low-tech” method involves highly skilled artisans and master printers whose job it is to faithfully recreate Seuss’s original works - The result is a beautifully created artwork."
In otherwords, The Chase Group is hiring chromists (someone who copies the artist’s work) to so-call “recreate Seuss’s original works” and then deceptively pass off these chromist-made and/or photomechanical reproductions as Theodor Geisel’s “artwork.”
That is a “knowing misrepresentation of a material fact or truth to induces a person to his or her own detriment” which is one legal definition of -fraud-.
If The Chase Group thought they could convince the public they were "alchemists" and could make gold from lead and sell it at $500 an ounce, they would no doubt try it.
SIXTH, under "2. The Secret Art and Archive Collection," it states: "Many of these works have been reproduced using hand-pulled serigraphy - this intentionally “low-tech” method is usually carried out under the direction of a master printmaker who must carefully breakdown an original painting into its many colors - print each color, one layer at a time."
“Serigraphs” can only be created by a -LIVING- artist.
“Serigraphs” are original works of visual art that must be, under U.S. Custom’s regulations, "wholly executed by hand by the artist." Specifically, the -living- artist would cut and/or paint stencils and print one color at a time and continue that creative process until the completion of that original “work of visual art” ie. serigraph.
If someone, other than the artist, legally -reproduces- “drawings {or} paintings,” in a silkscreen medium, it would be, at best, a -reproductions-
SEVENTH, under "2. The Secret Art and Archive Collection," second paragraph, it states: "some works in the collection employ more modern printmaking techniques not available to artists of past generations."
Funny, when these non-disclosed reproduction techniques were “employ{ed},” it wasn't available to Theodor Geisel either because he was -dead-.
Additionally, they state: "giclee offer a wide range of color saturation - Prints reproduced using this method capitalize on the brilliant fidelity of specially calibrated digital presses, coupled with inks and papers which were developed over many years and specifically designed for fine art printmaking."
The so-called "fine art printmaking" called "Giclee," when using the brightly colored dyes, is as lightfast as a "cereal box,” These contentious issues of lightfastness of giclee reproduction technology were documented and published in the October 1996 ART CALENDAR issue.
There goes their so-called "brilliant fidelity."
EIGHTH, and furthermore, it states: "Just as silkscreen printmaking revolutionized the way artist and printmakers expressed themselves in the 1960s, so too has giclee printmaking in the early 21st century."
What's incredibly obscene is Theodor Geisel died in the 20th-century and yet according to The Chase Group he is stilling coming out with new work in the 21st-century.
How's he doing that?
NINTH, under "3. The Collection of Unorthodox Taxidermy (Seuss Sculptures)," it states: "Today, Seuss’s sculptures are reproduced as hand-painted cast resin sculptures and are painstakingly prepared to accurately recreate the aesthetic brilliance of the originals."
The big problem is: "sculptures" are -not- reproduced. Under U.S. Copyright Law, sculptures are created by living artists. It is a massive oxymoron to misrepresent three-dimensional reproductions as "sculptures."
And for The Chase Group and participating galleries to do so for money, is “a knowing misrepresentation of the truth or concealment of a material fact to induce another to act to his or her detriment” which is one legal definition of -fraud-.
TENTH, the question is asked: "Are these works signed by Dr. Seuss."
The answer given is: "because the reproductions included in The Art of Dr. Seuss project were created after his lifetime, each limited edition lithograph and serigraph bears an Authorized Printed Signature and each sculpture an Authorized Engraved Signature."
"Signature," by definition, means autographed by the person on hand. Since, Theodor Geisel was -dead- when these 72,000 reproductions were posthumously reproduced with his so-called “signature” applied.
How’d the dead do that?
Once again, under U.S. Copyright Law, you can't have a "limited edition" attributed to a dead guy because they could not have obviously "signed and numbered" anything.
In other words, The Chase Group is, with impunity, forging Theodor Geisel’s work and his signature and calling them the "Art of Dr. Seuss" with "Dr. Seuss signatures" to help them defraud the public of hundreds to thousands of dollars each.
Finally, it asks: "Is there a certificate of authenticity issues for these works?" The answer given is: "Yes."
The Chase Group would have the public imagine 72,000 non-disclosed -fales-, with counterfeit signatures applied, are transformed magically to "{art}works" and authenticated by a piece of paper.
Sadly, in closing, for the consumers and legitimate artists, The Chase Group are one of the too many to mention alchemists of the 21st-century who come into the art industry with one goal: "why let the truth interfere with commerce."
For additional documentation, link to: Art of Dr. Seuss FRAUD

22 Comments:
I really appreciate this blog post. On vacation this past weekend, I had thoughts about spending $2000 on what I thought was Seuss original. Certainly one could say I was naive to expect an original at that price, but my experience was that the gallery would have been happy to make the sale knowing I thought I was buying something I wasn't. I think what I find most troubling is the "official" Dr. Seuss signature, which is a recreation. I'd like to believe without your blog I would have read the fine print and asked questions and came to the same purchase decision, but your post accelerated the process. I don't expect to ever make a future purchase from a gallery that has sold "The Art of Dr. Seuss".
So what can be done. Is it possible to file a suit against such a large corporation?
Or, perhaps, a suit against a gallery or gallery chain would be more feasible?????
THANK YOU, Gary, for bringing this to light. I have published your comment regarding my reivew of the show on my blog.
And, I published your "coverup" piece after the review as well.
If you get a chance, read my review on the blog of a Marilyn Monroe exhibit...it was just plain old unsettling.
What brilliant work! After having written a blog post on a touring exhibition that has reached Australia (with absolutely no indication that what we were seeing were fakes - thank hades I didn't buy anything), I wrote a well-received blog post on taxonomy, skepticism and the frauds that have occurred in natural history. I included a light-hearted look at the taxonomy (frauds!) of the Seuss exhibition and compared them to the fakes perpetrated for educational reasons in modern times.
To discover the two posts on what has been done with his art (thank you so much for commenting) has just made my blog entry even better. I think that this has the potential to be brought to a wider audience, particularly natural historians, as not only an example of art fraud but a scam equal to the Barnam Feejee mermaids.
As I wrote on my blog - skepticism about these elements are valuable and only bring us to emphasize critical thinking no matter what the academic field is approached. Thank you very, very much!
How come you do not sue them for selling fakes? Or expose the galleries for the frauds they are? Posting a blog is great to get your point across, but it is meaningless in the scope of reality. Have you attempted to purseu legal action? If not, how come?
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Replica, in Ralph Mayer's Dictionary of Art Terms & Techniques, is defined as: "an exact copy or duplicate of a work - done by the artist who created the original."
If you photograph a copyrighted work of visual art and hire a chromist to reproduce it, you would have a reproduction. Without permission of that artist, you and the chromist you paid to reproduce it, would be violating that artist's copyright.
Then potential serious questions of law and the penalties they exact may come into play for the chromist and you.
In closing, I hope you will consider the above to empower you on the choices you may make.
As an artist, creator of original lithographs and scholar, I feel morally obligated to inform the public, by my blog, of the misrepresentation of reproductions as original works of visual art.
Additionally, I am the source of hundreds of published articles, radio broadcasts and televised stories on art fraud.
In other words, with full and honest disclosure to these contentious issues of authenticity the consumer might be able to give informed consent.
To achieve that goal, I use independent documented definitions I did not define, statutory law I did not legislate and historical references I did not write, much less published, to make my conclusions.
So, when some state I have the right to my opinion, I reply I haven't voiced it yet.
As for legal action, one must have a standing to sue. Did I purchase one? Since I have not purchased one of the many non-disclosed reproductions or outright fakes I have documented in my blog, I can't sue for damages.
Additionally, even though one could argue the misrepresentation of reproductions as original works of art may constitute unfair trade against legitimate artists, much less those who sell fully disclosed reproductions, one would have to document direct damages as a result.
That could be very difficult and expensive. Not to mention those involved in this kind of misrepresentation are not holding on to their ill-gotten gains in a bank waiting for the courts to return it to the victims.
Even if you win a court judgment, the expense and time spent might be prohibitive, not to mention possibly receiving nothing but a moral victory.
I agree that the pieces are replica's, but they are original replica's. That is what all the sellers are saying. What is original is the art work.
It's like looking at a Lousiville Slugger baseball bat signed by Albert Pujols. We all know he didn't sign the bat, but the signature was Albert Pujols' signature taken from a mold or wherever they take it from.
The Dr. Seuss art is advertised the same way. The FAQ section of their web-site states all of that.
I agree you can post the law, but the web-site properly disclosed what they are selling. If they did not post that, then I would agree with you. As long as there is disclosure, then it is legal.
I know you personally take this to heart because you are in the field, and like you I get very heated when I view things personally. You need to relax and stop bashing Dr Seuss, he was a great writer and his art is pretty cool. Great colors and trippy-looking characters.
As I said before, the price is way beyond my wallet so I could never afford a piece, but if people like it that much we live in a free market society, so demand drives the price.
Dead artists can't create serigraphs, lithographs and sculptures, much less replicas.
Dead artists can't sign anything.
Dead artists can't number anything.
In closing, Audrey Geisel, The Chase Group and all participating galleries are committing fraud when they misrepresent chromist-made/photo-mechanical reproductions with counterfeit Dr. Seuss signatures posthumously applied as the "Art of Dr. Seuss."
I'm sorry gary that you feel to see the reality here. Dead people can sign anything or do anything, you are correct. If you go to a store to buy a Jimi Hendrix CD, is that really is music? How can it be since he is dead. How to dead people make music? The music distributers must all be selling fakes.
That is not the case. It is original music, just like Dr Seuss's art is original.
No galleries are misrepresenting anything. Just read the FAQ section of the drseussart.com site and you will read what they are selling.
In the previous post, I meant "can't sign anything...", no can sign anything...
If no one is misrepresenting anything then why is the Chase Group and participating galleries promoting for sale serigraphs, lithographs and sculptures by Dr. Seuss a.k.a. Theodor Geisel?
All of those so-called serigraphs, lithographs and sculpture attibuted to him are actually non-disclosed reproductions reproduced after 1997.
Theodor Geisel died in 1991.
The artist is the only one who can make original works of visual art ie. serigraphs, lithographs and sculptures.
The Chase Group FAQ website is an attempt to coverup their fraud by commingling terms such as reproduction and serigraph as if they are interchangable. The result is well meaning individuals, such as yourself, are mislead. Confusion is the mantle of con artists who want your money and will say anthing to get it.
Then where did the art come from? Did someone in the Chase Group draw the templates, or were they copied from previous Dr Seuss artwork?
I just find it hard to believe that some prestigoius galleries that also sell Picasso's would try to con people.
Has a well reknown firm like Sotherby's had any comments on this work?
To answer your questions about the "Art of Dr. Seuss FRAUD," link to; http://garyarseneau.blogspot.com/2006/09/art-of-dr-seuss-fraud.html
As for those "prestigoius galleries" you speak of, if they are offering to sell the so-called "Art of Dr. Seuss" as Theodor Geisel's lithographs and edition sculptures then they either don't know what they are doing or they don't want the public to know or both.
Remember Theodor Geisel -never- created a lithograph, serigraph or edition sculpture in his life, much less after his death.
As for Sothebys, you'll have to ask them.
well.....I am convinced you are correct. I doubt these serigraphs were even pulled by anything other than CNC machines. Kudos to you for kicking these so-called pretentious fine-art galleries in their moneygrubbing a$$, sir!
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
This post has been removed by the author.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home